Head of BBC News, Richard Sambrook, has blogged about the issues with sorting through the outpouring of tweets from Iran.
He cites a list of rumours which I've also seen flowing around. None are yet confirmed but many have the ring of truth (or past practice) behind them.
Interestingly, he doesn't use the rumours to damn Twitter, saying:
If you had a reasonable understanding of social media, how to set up and assess feeds, how to compare and contrast information, if you had a reasonable understanding of news flows, a developed sense of scepticism, and an above average understanding of the political situation in Iran, you would have emerged much better informed than the lay viewer relying on TV or Radio news. The information online ran significantly ahead of the news organisations (who hopefully were taking time to check what they could) but it came at a high noise to signal ratio....(at one point I measured almost 2500 updates in a minute - though usually it was closer to 200)There are at least two other uses which I have watched Twitter be put to.
- To co-ordinate take-down operations against government websites
- To distribute locations for proxy servers so people in Iran can get news, pictures and video out
As well thousands of followers around the world have narrowed down the individual accounts they should follow from the fast-flowing river that #iranelection has become.
Many have been following Change_for_Iran, a student who has been tweeting, sometimes harrowing messages, throughout the siege of Tehran University.
Another good source has been StopAhmadi who has tweeted at a furious rate but has made a point of saying if information is confirmed or not.
For more see this FriendFeed compilation of messages coming from Inside Iran.
- Previous post: Twitter: let the last doubter now shut up